Legal Opinion
City of Asheville v. State
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 21, 2016No. 391PA15PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Justice.
In 2013, the General Assembly enacted legislation that effectively required the City of Asheville to involuntarily transfer the assets that it uses to operate a public water system to a newly created metropolitan water and sewerage district. See Act of May 2, 2013, ch. 50, 2013 N.C. Sess. Laws 118, amended by Act of July 22, 2013, ch. 388, secs. 4-5, 2013 N.C. Sess. Laws 1605, 1618. Following the enactment of this legislation, the City sought a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief in Superior Court, Wake County. The trial court concluded that this involuntary transfer…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Adams v. North Carolina Department of Natural & Economic ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- McIntyre v. ClarksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Williams v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Appalachian MaterialsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- Appalachian MaterialsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- City of Winston-Salem v. Northwest Child Development Centers, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Fearrington v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2024
- In re ChastainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.