Legal Opinion · Dissent

Campbell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 3, 1987No. 86-1622Published

1Dissent

WIGGINS,

dissenting:

We are presented with a narrow question: does the 1982 amendment that changed the method for determining the rate of post-judgment interest apply to a judgment against the United States entered before the effective date of the amendment? The majority holds that it does for interest accruing after the effective date. I believe that Congress intended the change in the rate of interest to apply only to judgments entered on or after the effective date. The majority of courts have also reached that conclusion. As I find no sound reason to depart from that result, I respectfully…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Morley v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Handgards, Inc., a Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Dollar Rent a Car Systems, Inc., Dollar Rent a Car-Washington, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  5. Edward B. Brooks, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API