United States v. Hori Bros.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge
The appellee imported, at the port of Los Angeles, certain articles entered as toys. These were classified by the collector as toys, undel the following provision in paragraph 1414, Tariff Act of 1922:
Par. 1414. * * * all other toys, and parts of toys, not composed of china, porcelain, parían, bisque, earthen or stone ware, and not specially provided for, 70 per centum ad valorem.
The importer protested, claiming them to be dutiable as swords, under paragraph 363 of said act, which is as follows:
Par. 363. Sword blades, and swords and side arms, irrespective of quality or use, wholly or in part…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- United States v. China & Japan Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
- Morimura Bros. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908