Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 2011No. WD 72379PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Kyle Stewart appeals the summary judgment granted in favor of Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company on Stewart’s breach of contract claim. Stewart contends the circuit court erred in determining that the anti-stacking language in his automobile liability insurance policy is not ambiguous. For reasons explained herein, we affirm the summary judgment.

Factual and Prooedural History

In February 2007, Kyle Stewart, while a passenger in a vehicle driven by Zachary Tanner, was seriously injured in a single car collision. Tanner was insured by American Standard Insurance Company of Wisconsin on an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gibson v. BrewerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Seeck v. Geico General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  3. Krombach v. Mayflower Ins. Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. Ritchie v. Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. Magee v. Blue Ridge Professional Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. ABB, Inc. v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Parkway Construction Services, Inc., Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Blackline LLC d/b/a Blackline Design and Construction, and Magnolia Halliday, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Jaudes v. Progressive Preferred InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014
  4. Jones v. Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Williams v. Southern Union Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API