Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Brookstone Stores, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided May 24, 2006No. Civil Action 05-0369-WS-CPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

STEELE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant D & M Sales, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Class Action Complaint (doc. 100). The Motion has been briefed and is now ripe for disposition.

I. Background.

This putative class action arises from plaintiff Laura Matthews’ claim that defendant Brookstone Stores, Inc. and various related Brookstone entities (collectively, “Brookstone”) unlawfully marketed and sold “Pure-Ion” ionizing air purifiers to consumers in the United States. According to the Second Amended Complaint, these devices, which are alleged…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. D. Omar Valdez, Worldstar Communications Corp. v. James S. FeltmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  2. In Re Magnetic Audiotape Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. Peterson v. Highland Music, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Stubbs v. Wyndham Nassau Resort & Crystal Palace CasinoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  5. Linda Hamilton, Individually and as of the Estate of George Hamilton v. Atlas Turner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Figueroa v. Sharper Image Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
  2. Mother Doe I v. Al MaktoumDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
  3. Aguila v. RQM+ LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025
  4. Aguila v. RQM+ LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025
  5. Berkeley Ventures II, LLC v. Sionic Mobile CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2021

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API