Legal Opinion

Yraguen v. Ford Motor Company

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 5, 2025No. 6:23-cv-01366Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION JUAN YRAGUEN; KRIS YRAGUEN, Plaintiffs, No. 6:23-cv-01366-AA v. OPINION & ORDER FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. _______________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge. This case comes before the Court on Defendant Ford Motor Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. ECF No. 39. The Court concludes that this motion is appropriate for resolution without oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. LEGAL STANDARD Summary judgment is appropriate if the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Tideway Oil Programs, Inc. v. SerioMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Sealey v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Waddill v. Anchor Hocking, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API