Legal Opinion

People v. Vineberg

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1981No. Crim. 36674PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOLF, J. *

The defendants were convicted of seven counts of grand theft arising from the sale by them of gold and silver which was stored with their company, United States Silver Corporation (hereinafter referred to as U.S. Silver).

The Facts

Defendants Norman Vineberg and Douglas Todd Parker were at all times relevant to these proceedings, the owners, operators, and persons in control of U.S. Silver. U.S. Silver was in the business of buying, selling and storing gold and silver coins and bullion. As respects its storage operation, U.S. Silver maintained a vault on its premises and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. Nor WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. McCallaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. People v. AresenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. NavarroAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. AgerWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. AgerWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. ChaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API