Legal Opinion

Grant v. Miller

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 2005No. COA04-979PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Defendants appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to dismiss plaintiff’s defamation claim. For the reasons discussed herein, we dismiss the appeal as interlocutory.

In the fall of 2002, plaintiff Carolyn Grant (Grant) and defendant Bradley Miller (Miller) were opponents in an election for a new seat in the United States House of Representatives. During the campaign, defendants ran a political campaign advertisement containing certain statements and opinions with regard to Grant’s fitness as a candidate for that office.

Grant instituted this action against defendants,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Bolton Corp. v. T. A. Loving Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. The COUNTY OF DURHAM v. DayeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Aym Techs., LLC v. RodgersNorth Carolina Business Court · 2020
  3. Brown v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Brown v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Hundley v. AutoMoneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API