Legal Opinion

Mortgage Alliance Corp. v. Pickens County

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 2012No. A12A0401PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MCFADDEN, Judge.

This appeal is from a summary judgment holding that a proceeding appellant had denominated an inverse condemnation action was untimely filed. The trial court correctly held that the action is properly characterized as an appeal from a county zoning decision and is therefore subject to the 30-day time limit for appeals to superior court set out in OCGA § 5-3-20. The zoning decision was in the form of a letter from the sole county commissioner. Because the action was filed more than 30 days after the letter was signed, the trial court correctly determined that the action was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. King v. City of BainbridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Mayor of Savannah v. Savannah Cigarette & Amusement Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. Taco Mac v. City of Atlanta Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  4. Chadwick v. Gwinnett CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  5. Head v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mortgage Alliance Corp. v. Pickens CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Noble Parking, Inc. v. Centergy One Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  3. Noble Parking, Inc. v. Centergy One Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API