Legal Opinion

Shoen v. Shoen

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 24, 1997No. 1 CA-CV 95-0199PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

This appeal is the latest chapter in the long-standing litigation among members of the Shoen family over control of AMERCO, the parent company of U-Haul. Plaintiffs were shareholders who sued Edward “Joe” Shoen (“Joe”) and other members of AMERCO’s board of directors (collectively, “defendants”) regarding conduct in 1988 that deprived plaintiffs of majority ownership. After a seven-week trial, a jury awarded plaintiffs $1.47 billion in compensatory damages against all defendants and $70 million in punitive damages against only Joe. The trial court, however, granted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd. v. City of Monterey, Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd., and Monterey-Del Monte Dunes Corporation v. City of MontereyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Nelson v. Phoenix Resort Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. Mammo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Piper v. Bear Medical Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Caudle v. Bristow Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Monaco v. HealthPartners of Southern ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Security Title Agency, Inc. v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Goodman v. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API