Federal Deposit Insurance v. Purcell (In Re Purcell)
District Court, D. Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BILLINGS, District Judge.
Appellant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as receiver of Valley Bank (“FDIC”) appeals a July 2, 1992 decision of Judge Conrad of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court denying the FDIC’s motion to dismiss appellee Maxine B. Purcell’s (“Purcell”) cause of action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and granting Purcell’s motion for summary judgment, 141 B.R. 480. Appellee Purcell filed opposition.
The sole issue that this Court needs to decide on appeal is whether the Bankruptcy Court properly exercised jurisdiction over debtor Purcell’s cause of action…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings & Loan InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- The Resolution Trust Corp. v. Leonard S. Elman Berger, Steingut, Tarnoff & SternCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- In Re: Koreag, Controle Et Revision S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Office and Professional Employees International Union, Local 2 v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Circle Industries, Division of Nastasi-White, Inc. v. City Federal Savings BankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa v. City SavingsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Floyd v. Heno v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Simon v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Parker North American Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp. (In re Parker North American Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Scott v. Resolution Trust Corp. (In Re Scott)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.