Legal Opinion

FAYAD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00032Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARYBELLE FAYAD, Case No. 2:23-cv-00032-JDW v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MEMORANDUM In most workplaces, some employees manage the business’s affairs and exercise broad discretion over what they do and how and when they do it. For them, “[t]ime is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.” Douglas Adams, 18 (1986). Employees like that are exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime requirements. But other employees don’t have that kind of discretion. They have to do what they’re told, or the tasks they perform are not…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API