Legal Opinion

American Fire Prevention Bureau, Inc. v. Rockwood Sprinkler Co. of Massachusetts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 3, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGlennon, J.

This action was instituted to recover the sum of $4,898, which represents a balance alleged to have been due on the defendant’s guaranty that one-half of plaintiff’s profit for the “ contract year ” from the sale of electric appliances would amount to at least $5,000.

Two causes of action are set forth in the complaint, the first on the theory of breach of contract, and the second on an account stated. The defendant in its answer set up certain counterclaims, to which a reply was served in due course.

After the issues were joined, the defendant made a motion under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heyman Cohen & Sons, Inc. v. M. Lurie Woolen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Outlet Embroidery Co. v. MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Fire Prevention Bureau, Inc. v. Automatic Sprinkler Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  2. People v. BerkowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API