Legal Opinion

American Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Ringling Bros.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 23, 2007No. Civ. Action 03-2006 (EGS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Animal Welfare Institute, The Fund for Animals, Tom Rider, and Animal Protection Institute 1 have filed a lawsuit under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA” or “Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq., against Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Circus and Feld Entertainment, Inc. (“FEI”) 2 for “taking” Asian elephants in violation of the ESA. Pending before the Court is defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Upon consideration of the motion, response and reply thereto,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gayle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Hicks v. BledsoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Butler v. SchapiroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Feld Entertainment, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  5. Ventura v. BEBO Foods, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API