Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 23, 1988Published

1Dissent

Sullivan, J. P. (dissenting).

This is an action on a construction contract to recover, inter alia, damages for changed subsurface conditions, as well as extra and protest (disputed) work. Defendants, the City of New York and the Transit Authority, appeal from the denial of their motion for leave to amend the answer to assert the affirmative defense that, pursuant to an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedure to which the parties had agreed, plaintiff submitted its claims for extra costs to the Transit Authority’s chief engineer, whose determinations denying those claims are final and…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Kalisch-Jarcho, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. McCaskey, Davies & Associates, Inc. v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Two Guys v. S.F.R. Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API