Legal Opinion

Sherrill v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1910No. Docket No. 177PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari to Wayne; Murphy, J. Case by John Sherrill against the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada and others for personal injuries. An order denying a motion to quash a service of summons is reviewed by the above named defendant on writ of certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiff, residing in Detroit, in this State, brought suit in the Wayne circuit court in an action of trespass on the case against the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, the Grand Trunk Western Railway, and the Detroit & Canada Grand Trunk Junction Railroad Company by summons. The last two named defendants have appeared, and an issue as to them has been joined. It is admitted that this appellant, the other defendant, is a foreign corporation organized under the laws of Canada, and that the accident which caused the injury to plaintiff, to recover damages for which this suit was brought,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Showen v. J. L. Owens Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reaume & Silloway, Inc. v. TetzlaffMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Daniels v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Clabaugh v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Lyon v. BaldwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Yund v. Excelsior Wrapper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API