Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Garamendi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1ConcurrenceGraber, Circuit Judge
I concur in the result for the following reasons.
1.The claim of preemption by the foreign affairs power is not a fee-generating claim, for the reasons ably explained by the district court. In short, the foreign affairs power, like the Supremacy Clause, creates no individual rights enforceable under 28 U.S.C. § 1983. Cf. Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles, 493 U.S. 103, 107, 110 S.Ct. 444, 107 L.Ed.2d 420 (1989) (“[T]he Supremacy Clause, of its own force, does not create rights enforceable under § 1983.”); Associated Gen. Contractors v. Smith, 74 F.3d 926, 931 (9th Cir.1996)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- American Ins. Assn. v. GaramendiSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Carreras v. City of AnaheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- L.A. All. for Survival v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.