Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Garamendi

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 9, 2005No. 04-15332, 04-15455Published

1ConcurrenceGraber, Circuit Judge

I concur in the result for the following reasons.

1.The claim of preemption by the foreign affairs power is not a fee-generating claim, for the reasons ably explained by the district court. In short, the foreign affairs power, like the Supremacy Clause, creates no individual rights enforceable under 28 U.S.C. § 1983. Cf. Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles, 493 U.S. 103, 107, 110 S.Ct. 444, 107 L.Ed.2d 420 (1989) (“[T]he Supremacy Clause, of its own force, does not create rights enforceable under § 1983.”); Associated Gen. Contractors v. Smith, 74 F.3d 926, 931 (9th Cir.1996)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. American Ins. Assn. v. GaramendiSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Carreras v. City of AnaheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. L.A. All. for Survival v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API