Legal Opinion

Latham Co. v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 20, 1909PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from the County Court of Eastland County. Tried below before Hon. E. A. Hill.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, Chief Justice.

—On March 10, 1908, plaintiff in error suffered a judgment by default in favor of defendant in error upon a duly verified account for goods, wares and merchandise alleged to have been sold and delivered to plaintiff in error. Defendant in error alleged in its petition that plaintiff in error was “a corporation, duly organized under the laws of the State of Texas, and doing business at Eastland in the County of Eastland in the State of Texas,” and the prayer was “that defendant be cited to appear and answer this petition,” without an allegation of the name of any person…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Investors Diversified Services, Inc. v. BrunerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Lake v. Texas News Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1931
  3. Ponca Wholesale Mercantile Co. v. AlleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. American Soda Fountain Co. v. Hairston Drug Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Ellis v. Lamb-Mcashan Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API