Legal Opinion

Begley v. Prudential Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1956PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDye, J.

The plaintiff is the beneficiary named in three policies of insurance issued by the defendant company on the life of her late husband. The policies each contained a provision for double indemnity benefits payable ‘ ‘ upon receipt * * * [by the company] * * * of due proof that the death of the Insured occurred as a result, directly and independently of all other causes, of bodily injuries effected solely through external, violent and accidental means ” except that it would not be paid “ if * * * death results * * * (c) from suicide ”.

Before commencing the within suit and within the time…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wachtel v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Wellisch v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Winter v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  2. People v. LeyvaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Melville v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Schelberger v. Eastern Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Schelberger v. Eastern Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API