Legal Opinion

State v. Syed

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 8, 2019No. 24/18Published

1Opinion of the Court

State of Maryland v. Adnan Syed, No. 24, September Term, 2018. Opinion by Greene, J. CRIMINAL LAW—POST CONVICTION—INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL—FAILURE OF TRIAL COUNSEL TO INTERVIEW POTENTIAL ALIBI WITNESS—STRICKLAND V. WASHINGTON The Court of Appeals held that under the deficient performance prong of Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668

(1984), at a minimum, Respondent’s trial counsel had a duty to contact a potential alibi witness to investigate or explore that person’s background and potential as an alibi. The failure of Respondent’s trial counsel to contact an alibi witness…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API