Haytko v. William Crabb & Co.

17 N.J. Super. 95 (1951)

85 A.2d 229

WILLIAM HAYTKO, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v.

WILLIAM CRABB & COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court Law Division.

Decided December 5, 1951.

Mr. Harry Cohn, attorney for the petitioner-appellant.

Mr. Robert A. Vanderbilt, attorney for the respondent-appellee.

FRANCIS, J.C.C.

Haytko's petition for an award of workmen's compensation was dismissed on the ground that he was a casual employee within the contemplation of R.S. 34:15-36. He now appeals.

The evidence is not substantially in dispute. It shows that respondent was engaged in…