Haytko v. William Crabb & Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
21 N.J. Super. 330 (1952)
91 A.2d 231
WILLIAM HAYTKO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
WILLIAM CRABB AND CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 8, 1952.
Decided September 16, 1952.
Before Judges JAYNE, PROCTOR, and SCHETTINO.
Mr. Marshall Crowley argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Toner, Crowley & Ackerman, attorneys; Mr. Robert A. Vanderbilt, on the brief).
Mr. Harry Cohn argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.
We concur in the conclusion expressed by Judge Francis and reported in 17 N.J. Super. 95 (Co. Ct.,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Haytko v. William Crabb & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Haytko v. William Crabb & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
3Cited by2 opinions
- Graham v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- O'NEIL v. BilottaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952