Legal Opinion

Haytko v. William Crabb & Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 16, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

21 N.J. Super. 330 (1952)

91 A.2d 231

WILLIAM HAYTKO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

WILLIAM CRABB AND CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 8, 1952.

Decided September 16, 1952.

Before Judges JAYNE, PROCTOR, and SCHETTINO.

Mr. Marshall Crowley argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Toner, Crowley & Ackerman, attorneys; Mr. Robert A. Vanderbilt, on the brief).

Mr. Harry Cohn argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

We concur in the conclusion expressed by Judge Francis and reported in 17 N.J. Super. 95 (Co. Ct.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haytko v. William Crabb & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Haytko v. William Crabb & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graham v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. O'NEIL v. BilottaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API