State v. Sayler
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, J.
Respondent Chris H. Sayler lured two boys, ages 10 and 12, into the upstairs area of his garage and masturbated in front of them. He was convicted in District Court of public indecency under RCW 9A.88-.010(2), a gross misdemeanor. On appellate review under RALJ, the Superior Court held that the statute was ambiguous and must be given that meaning most favorable to respondent. Thus, the State was required to prove that the offense occurred in a public place. Since it occurred in a private place, 1 the proof was insufficient. The court dismissed the charges. We granted discretionary review, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. GalbreathWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. KosankeWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Reynolds v. DonohoWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. JuneauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- In Re Estate of TorandoWashington Supreme Court · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- State v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Kahler v. KernesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- State v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- State v. ChilesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.