Legal Opinion
Barlip v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 6, 1979No. 109 Misc. Dkt. No. 2PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Bowman,
By a petition for review in the nature of a complaint in mandamus against the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) petitioner would have this Court strike down a special condition of his parole which prohibits him from contacting a social agency concerning his children without prior permission of his parole agent. He asserts that imposition by the Board of this special condition of parole is beyond *460its statutory authority and unconstitutionally impairs his right of free speech and association.
After the pleadings were closed the Board moved for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Arthur J. Porth v. The Hon. George Templar and the United States of America, United States of America v. Arthur J. PorthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- In Re ManninoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bradshaw v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Counts v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- Seyler v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Wagner v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.