Legal Opinion

Foster v. Hon

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 1, 1970PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARNEY, Judge.

The petitioners, Charles O. Hon, Jr., Margaret Hon Snodgrass, Elizabeth Hon Poynton, as the surviving adult descendants of Mary B. Hon along with Hamilton National Bank of Chattanooga and Charles O. Hon, Jr., as co-executors under the will of Mary B. Hon, deceased, have filed a petition for writ of error to review the action of the Chancellor in denying their intervening petition and rendering a judgment in favor of the respondent, Raymond Prater, administrator ad litem of the estate of Daniel B. Hon, deceased. More specifically, this case involves the construction of a clause…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bewley & Rader Land Co. v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reef v. BernsteinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  2. David Meyers, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API