Scott v. City of Peoria
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOHN A. GORMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Now before the Court is the Plaintiffs Motion to Compel (#57). The motion is fully briefed, and I have carefully considered all of the submissions of the parties. For the following reasons, the Motion to Compel is GRANTED.
INTRODUCTION
In this case, Plaintiff alleges that the individual defendants were involved in the use of excessive force during a traffic stop. In addition to the individual liability of the police officers, Plaintiff has asserted a Monell claim against the City of Peoria.
The underlying events resulted in an internal…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dorato ex rel. Wrongful Death Claim of Tillison v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Ricco v. Southwest Surgery Center, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Harris v. One Hope United, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2015
- Blanchard v. HyatteDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
- Breen v. State Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.