Legal Opinion

Smiljanic v. Niedermeyer

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 7, 2007No. 2006AP3083PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.

¶ 1. This appeal concerns a dis-

pute over the effect of a recorded affidavit of the sellers' broker that averred the sellers had intended to convey an easement not reflected in the recorded deed. The circuit court concluded that the affidavit, recorded in 1955, was not a valid means of conveying the easement or correcting the deed. The court therefore granted summary judgment against Douglas Smiljanic, the person claiming he has the right to the easement. Smiljanic appeals, contending that the recorded affidavit is a valid method of correcting the deed, that it was not necessary to utilize…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Turner v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  4. MacH v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  5. Negus v. Madison Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prezioso v. AertsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
  2. Seelen v. Couillard (In re Couillard)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2012
  3. Seelen v. Couillard (In re Couillard)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API