Legal Opinion

Cahill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 28, 1972No. 1 Div. 149PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The indictment charged that the appellant did falsely pretend to Elizabeth Rollings with intent to defraud that he owned all of the interest and assets in the Fred Astaire Dance Studio in Mobile, Alabama, and by means of such false pretense obtained from said Elizabeth Rollings twenty thousand dollars. The trial resulted in a verdict of guilty and a judgment sentencing appellant to imprisonment in the penitentiary for six years.

On the trial of the case the prosecuting witness Elizabeth Rollings testified in substance that she was fifty-nine years of age and that she first heard of the Fred…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blue v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Brandon v. Progress Distilling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Britton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. Carlisle v. KillebrewSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Morrison v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cahill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API