Legal Opinion

Morrison v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 22, 1957No. 8 Div. 912PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

We granted the writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals because that Court stated that it was bound to follow the holdings in State v. Autery, 1 Stew. 399, and Caldwell v. State, 160 Ala. 96, 49 So. 679, that in criminal proceedings charging assault and battery, the defendant may prov.e the pendency of a civil action against him for the same assault in mitigation of a possible fine, although it doubted the soundness of these holdings.

We do not agree with the reasoning in those cases as to the admissibility of the pendency of a civil action. That would permit the mitigation…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Britton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. Carlisle v. KillebrewSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. Phillips v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  4. Alabama Power Co. v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Cabel v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Moates v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Ex Parte BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Strickland v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Malone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API