C.U. Associates, Inc. v. R.B. Grove, Inc.

DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.

C.U. Associates, Inc. appeals that portion of the final judgment which found the ap-pellee, R.B. Grove, Inc., entitled to attorneys’ fees and costs as the prevailing party in this mechanics’ lien litigation.1 It con*1110tends that because the amount recovered by Grove in litigation was no greater than the amount offered to Grove before litigation, Grove cannot be considered the prevailing party.2

While appellant’s position finds some support elsewhere in this state, see Monde Investments No. 2, Inc. v. R.D. Taylor-Made Enterprises, Inc., 344 So.2d 871 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977);…