Johnny Lee Ransom v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Johnny Lee Ransom, a state prisoner, appeals from the district court’s denial without a hearing of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He asserts that his conviction of violating Fla.Stat.Ann. § 790.23 (1976) infringed rights guaranteed him by the Federal Constitution. His primary contention is that Section 790.23 is void for vagueness. This argument is without merit. In order to survive constitutional challenge on this ground, a statute need only provide “the person of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to know what is prohibited.” Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- George Roman Dreske v. James D. Holt, Sheriff, Martin County, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- John H. Baer, Individually and D/B/A Liberty Guns v. The City of WauwatosaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Pasquale Matassini, A/K/A Pat Matassini, and Robert E. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Frear v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Prieto v. Metropolitan Dade CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1989
- John H. Baer, Individually and D/B/A Liberty Guns v. The City of WauwatosaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.