Legal Opinion

Higy v. Columbia Rubber Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided November 22, 1883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtLowell, J.

The plaintiff filed his bill in February, 1883, alleging himself to be the owner of two patents for improvements in bustles,— one granted to Moses K. .Bortree, dated February 25,1873, No. 136,-127, and the other to himself as assignee of Henry W. Moulton, dated October 17, 1882, No. 266,185, — and that the defendant had infringed these patents. No answer or other pleadings were filed by the defendants, and a decree was entered, by consent, for the complainant, for nominal damages and for costs, and a perpetual injunction was issued. The complainant now moves for an attachment for violation of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hayes v. FischerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Turco-Halvah Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  2. Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. Christensen Engineering Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904
  3. Chicago Grain Door Co. v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1905
  4. Houghton v. Whitin Mach. WorksDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API