Legal Opinion

Aaron Hyche v. T. Christensen

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 19, 1999No. 98-1032PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

This case, twice returned to the district court for compliance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act, must unfortunately be remanded a third time. We have decided to publish a brief explanation in order to reiterate some of the points made in Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429 (7th Cir.1997), Pate v. Stevens, 163 F.3d 437 (7th Cir.1998), and Celske v. Edwards, 164 F.3d 396 (7th Cir.1999), about appropriate procedure.

After Hyche filed a notice of appeal, the district judge set a fee schedule under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b) but inconsistently wrote that he would later review…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. David Newlin v. David W. Helman, Jesse E. Robinson v. B. Smith, James C. Griffin v. William R. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Curtis J. Celske v. Thomas EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Timothy T. Pate v. Sergeant Thomas Stevens, Star 2051Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Earl D. Sperow v. Francis MelvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Minghao Lee v. William J. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. AMERSON v. DOZIERDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2020
  3. AMERSON v. SMITHDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2025
  4. ATL 21 WR OWNER LLC v. FITZGERALDDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2023
  5. Aaron Hyche v. T. ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API