Irvin v. Spratlin
Supreme Court of Georgia
■Complaint for land. Before Judge Holden. Wilkes superior court. November 7, 1905.
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, J.'
Exception is taken to the ruling of the court in directing a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs for the land in dispute. The correctness of this ruling depends upon the correctness of the ruling in excluding the documentary and parol evidence which was tendered. With that evidence excluded there would be nothing left except the prima facie case admitted. No dispute over evidence or other issue would be left, and the prima facie case admitted by the defendant would demand the verdict, and a direction from the court would be proper. We come, then, directly to the assignments of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- De Sollar v. HanscomeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Draper v. MedlockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Callaway v. IrvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Johnson v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- Kennedy v. McCarthySupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
3Cited by17 opinions
- Garrick v. TidwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Bonds v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Prisant v. FeingoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Taylor v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Federal Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.