Legal Opinion
Smith v. State of Okl.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 1, 1976No. CIV-76-0255ÂDPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
Having exhausted all state remedies available to him, the above-named petitioner seeks a Writ of Habeas Corpus in this court on the ground that his detention by virtue of the judgment and sentence in the District Court of Oklahoma County, State of Oklahoma, in case no. CRF-70-931 is unlawful because the prosecutor allegedly knowingly used perjured testimony to obtain petitioner’s conviction.
The court has examined the files and records herein together with the files and records of this court in case no. CIV. 75-0922-D, a previous Habeas application by this same…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Arnold George Lauer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Robert Lee Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Alastair Kyle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- William Anderson v. United States of America, Harold Moffett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smithwick v. WalkerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Graham v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1986
- Fillmore v. CrispDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1978
- United States of America v. Erick Gachuhi WanjikuDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026