Legal Opinion

General Agents Insurance Co. of America, Inc. v. Midwest Sporting Goods Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 28, 2004No. 1-02-3160PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNULTY

In this case we must decide whether an insurer may recover amounts it paid for defense of its insured in a lawsuit against the insured for claims that do not fall within the coverage of the insurance policy. We hold that under the circumstances of this case, where the insured knew when it accepted the payments that the insurer intended to seek recovery of defense costs if the court agreed that the claims were not covered, the insurer may recover any payments made for the claims not covered by the policy.

The City of Chicago (the City) and Cook County sued Midwest Sporting Goods (Midwest) for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. La Rotunda v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Walbrook Ins. Co. Ltd. v. Goshgarian & GoshgarianDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1989
  5. City of Chicago v. McKechneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. General Agents Insurance Co. of America, Inc. v. Midwest Sporting Goods Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Utility Audit, Inc. v. Horace Mann Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Taco Bell Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Bruger v. Olero, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  5. General Agents Insurance Co v. Midwest Sporting Goods Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API