Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.
¶ 1. The dispositive issue on this appeal is whether Wis. Stat. § 81.15 (2001-02), 1 which addresses governmental liability for highway defects, applies to a county that has a contract with the state to maintain a state highway. We conclude the statutory language "a highway which any county by law or by agreement with any town, city or village is bound to keep in repair," § 81.15, does not apply in this case, where Dane County was obligated by contract with the state to maintain the state highway that was allegedly defective. Because § 81.15 does not apply to Dane County in this case and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. SetagordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Strasser v. Transtech Mobile Fleet Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Firemen's Insurance v. Washburn CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- HSBC Realty Credit Corp. v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- HSBC Realty Credit Corp. v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006