Legal Opinion

Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 29, 2004No. 03-1415PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.

¶ 1. The dispositive issue on this appeal is whether Wis. Stat. § 81.15 (2001-02), 1 which addresses governmental liability for highway defects, applies to a county that has a contract with the state to maintain a state highway. We conclude the statutory language "a highway which any county by law or by agreement with any town, city or village is bound to keep in repair," § 81.15, does not apply in this case, where Dane County was obligated by contract with the state to maintain the state highway that was allegedly defective. Because § 81.15 does not apply to Dane County in this case and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. SetagordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Strasser v. Transtech Mobile Fleet Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Firemen's Insurance v. Washburn CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HSBC Realty Credit Corp. v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  2. HSBC Realty Credit Corp. v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API