Legal Opinion
Beals v. C&R Incessant, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 8, 2025No. 5:23-cv-02145Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION WILLIAM H. BEALS, et al., ) CASE NO. 5:23-cv-2145 ) ) Plaintiffs, ) CHIEF JUDGE SARA LIOI ) vs. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) AND ORDER C&R INCESSANT, INC., et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) Before the Court is the motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 40 (Motion)) filed by defendant C&R Incessant, Inc. (“C&R”). Plaintiffs William H. Beals (“Beals”) and Ann M. Beals (collectively “plaintiffs”) oppose the motion (Doc. No. 43 (Opposition)), and defendant filed a reply. (Doc. No. 45 (Reply).) For the reasons discussed herein, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.