Legal Opinion

Tellefsen v. Key System Transit Lines

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1961No. Civ. 19835PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered on an order sustaining demurrer to his first amended complaint without leave to amend.

Question Presented

Where the losing party, allegedly from ulterior motives, appeals from an adverse judgment, will an action for abuse of process lie against said party?

Record

Plaintiff’s first amended complaint alleged that in an action brought in the superior court against defendant for personal injuries plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant for the sum of $62,000; that maliciously defendant refused to pay said judgment 2 and although there was nothing in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Hauser v. BartowNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Tranchina v. ArcinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Pimentel v. HoukCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Tellefsen v. Key System Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Coleman v. Gulf Insurance GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Thornton v. RhodenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Younger v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API