Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ronald Francis Smart v. William D. Leeke, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections Attorney General of South Carolina

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1989No. 87-7737Published

1DissentMurnaghan, Circuit Judge

To me, the issue presented here is essentially simple though before I am through the canvassing of the many authorities some readers may be convinced otherwise. I start with the key definitional distinction. Malice aforethought is an element, an essential ingredient of the crime of murder in South Carolina. Malice aforethought does not enjoy that status in Ohio, or New York. Lack of self-defense equates to malice aforethought. Self-defense in South Carolina is no crime. It is a right. When, as here, the issue of whether or not there is self-defense has been factually injected into the case it…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API