Legal Opinion

Continental Western Insurance v. Clay

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 24, 1991No. 65476PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

This is a declaratory judgment action wherein Continental Western Insurance Company (Continental) seeks to rescind, ab initio, a temporary automobile liability insurance binder issued to Mark Clay. The district court held that: (1) Clay made fraudulent misrepresentations in his application for coverage; (2) Continental had the right of rescission ab initio as to Clay’s claim; and (3) Continental’s right of rescission does not extend to claims made by Michael D. Johnson, a passenger in the Clay vehicle who was injured in the accident…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Teeter v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. KurylowiczMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Teeter v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Fisher v. New Jersey Auto. Full Ins. Underwriting Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Harkrider v. PoseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  2. Van Horn v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Munroe v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Prudential v. Estate of Rojo-PachecoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Midland Risk Management Co. v. WatfordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API