Continental Western Insurance v. Clay
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
McFarland, J.:
This is a declaratory judgment action wherein Continental Western Insurance Company (Continental) seeks to rescind, ab initio, a temporary automobile liability insurance binder issued to Mark Clay. The district court held that: (1) Clay made fraudulent misrepresentations in his application for coverage; (2) Continental had the right of rescission ab initio as to Clay’s claim; and (3) Continental’s right of rescission does not extend to claims made by Michael D. Johnson, a passenger in the Clay vehicle who was injured in the accident…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Teeter v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. KurylowiczMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Teeter v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Fisher v. New Jersey Auto. Full Ins. Underwriting Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Harkrider v. PoseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Van Horn v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Munroe v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Prudential v. Estate of Rojo-PachecoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Midland Risk Management Co. v. WatfordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.