Legal Opinion

Rocha ex rel. Rocha v. Aczon

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1971No. 5058PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this case, we affirmed the judgment appealed from in a memorandum opinion, and appellee has moved for taxation of his costs and attorney’s fee against appellants under Rules 9(c) and 9(e) of the rules of the Supreme Court.

Under Rule 9(c), appellee claims cost of a copy of the transcript of testimony in the circuit court. That rule provides that the “cost of the transcript of record in the court below” shall be taxable in this court as part of the costs in favor of the prevailing party. The rule refers to the original transcript filed as part of the record on appeal and not to a copy of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jewell v. HarperOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Rosenthal v. BrangierDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1965
  3. Chapman v. First Insurance Co. of Hawaii, Ltd.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sugue v. F. L. Smithe Machine Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API