Sugue v. F. L. Smithe Machine Co.

Plaintiff-appellant, cross-appellee (appellant) filed a motion for approval and taxation of costs, and defendant-appellee, cross-appellant (cross-appellant), filed objections to said motion. A hearing was held on the motion.

Upon review and consideration of the affidavit and memorandum in support of the respective motion and objections, we are of the opinion that the appellant was the prevailing party, within the terms of Supreme Court Rule 9(c), in the appeal of this case. (Opinion filed February 23, 1976.)

In her motion for approval and taxation of costs the appellant claims cost of a copy of…