Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Haynes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 12, 1938No. 6 Div. 267PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The facts are stated by appellants substantially as follows:

Appellants are the adult heirs-at-law of Henry Robert Haynes, deceased. Appellee is • the minor child .of said decedent, who died in Cullman County, Alabama, on July 9, 1933, leaving appellants, appellee and other children- and a widow, who was the mother of appellants,- appellee and other children in the family. At the time of his death, -decedent owned the Northwest fourth of the Northeast fourth of Section nineteen, Township ten, R^'nge three west, containing forty acres more or less, situated in Cullman County,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. OvercastSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Buchannon v. BuchannonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Wright v. FanninSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Long v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Ticer v. HolesappleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Craig v. RootSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Price v. PriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Bishop v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Compton v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. McGregor v. McGregorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API