Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 26, 1942No. 6 Div. 914PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The bill as amended was a statutory effort to quiet title to the lands described therein by Lewis Johnson.

The cross bill of respondents, as amended, makes the following averments, viz.: “That respondents are owners of an undivided three-sixth reversionary or remainder interest in said lands, each of them being the owner of an undivided one-sixth of such interest or remainder by reason of their having inherited the same as their homestead from their father, R. L. Bishop, who died intestate in Marion County, on May 18, 1912, and who, at the time of his death, owned and was…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Keenum v. DodsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Winters v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Tartt v. NegusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  4. Pickett v. Doe ex rel. PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  5. Black v. Pratt Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Craig v. RootSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. White v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Harkins & Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Wiggins Estate Co. v. JefferySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Hammond v. ShippSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API