Legal Opinion
Hydrotherm, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 24, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtG. Robert Witmer, J.
This is an action by a supplier against a bonding company, wherein each party has moved for summary judgment. It appears that on or about October 1, 1959 plaintiff, a New Jersey manufacturer of heating units, sold and delivered *535a boiler unit to Bareham Plumbing and Heating Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “ Bareham ”) for the sum of $985.70 plus freight charges of $37.80, totaling $1,023.50, said unit to be installed in the Penfield Presbyterian Church (hereinafter referred to as the “ Church ”), for which Walzer & Miller were the architects. In connection with reconstruction work in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. HallenbeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- California Apparel Creators v. Wieder of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Coffee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- United States Ex Rel. American Radiator & Sanitary Corp. v. Northwestern Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Industrial Contracting Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Lynbrook Glass & Architectural Metals Corp. v. Elite Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Triangle Erectors, Inc. v. James King & Son., Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1963
- Lynbrook Glass & Architectural Metals Corp. v. Elite Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Chautauqua County Division of Solid Waste v. Haseley Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 2003