Triangle Erectors, Inc. v. James King & Son., Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
John P. Cohalan, Jr., J.
This action was originally instituted by Triangle Erectors, Inc. to foreclose a mechanics’ lien and for payment of the amount of the lien. The claims of plaintiff Triangle and all of the materialmen and subcontractors were disposed of by settlement prior to or upon the trial, except for the claims of the defendants, Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Company, John J. Nesbitt, Inc. and I. Burack, Inc. Disposition of the claims of the said defendants are the subject of this determination.
The principal issue presented is whether written notice was given pursuant to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Coffee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- United States Ex Rel. Bruce Co. v. Fraser Const. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949
- Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- United States Ex Rel. Hargis v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lynbrook Glass & Architectural Metals Corp. v. Elite Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- HNC Realty Co. v. Bay View Towers Apartments, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1977
- Lynbrook Glass & Architectural Metals Corp. v. Elite Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995