Legal Opinion
TICHANEN v. Harris & Harris, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided October 20, 2006No. 05 CV 935PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
GOODSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs, Helen Tickanen and John Theurich, filed a complaint against Defendant, Harris & Harris, Ltd. (“Harris”) alleging a violation of Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (“FDCPA”), on September 1, 2005. Specifically, plaintiffs allege Harris had sent dunning letters to plaintiffs identifying the creditor incorrectly. Harris answered on September 26, 2005; however, this court granted plaintiffs Motion to Amend Complaint, in which to add another plaintiff. On March 22, 2006,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Scheurer v. Fromm Family Foods LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2016
- Butto v. Collecto Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- 20/20 Foresight, Inc. v. McGuffinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Alston v. Navy Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Brady v. Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.