Legal Opinion
S.M. v. Tamaqua Area School District
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 26, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00525Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA S.M., as father and natural guardian of A.M., a minor, et al., CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-cv-00525 Plaintiffs, (SAPORITO, M.J.) v. TAMAQUA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion to compel discovery responses. (Doc. 47). The motion is fully briefed and ripe for decision. (Doc. 48; Doc. 3; Doc. 57). We incorporate our recitation of the factual allegations set forth in our Memorandum dated March 2, 2023 (Doc. 50). As discussed below, we will grant the motion in part,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Burt N. Sempier v. Johnson & HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Joanna Pacitti, a Minor, by Joseph Pacitti, and Stella Pacitti, Her Parents and Guardians v. MacY MacY East, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Holmes v. Pension Plan of Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Grider v. Keystone Health Plan Central, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.