Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Scally

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1923No. Civ. No. 2594PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

In addition to the usual allegations in a complaint to quiet title, the plaintiff alleged that defendant gave him and his wife, Margaret S. Kennedy, a daughter of defendant, the land in controversy, consisting of 160 acres, and that they took possession thereof under the gift and expended in making permanent improvements thereon the sum of $4,000 during the year 1912, $3,000 during 1913, and made valuable improvements in the years 1914 and 1915. The prayer is for a judgment decreeing “that plaintiff is the owner in fee,simple absolute, possessed and entitled to the possession of the undivided…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Couts v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Beckman v. WatersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Aalwyn's Law Institute v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Husheon v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Kinsell v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Walters v. Fidelity Mortgage of California, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
  3. O'KEEFE v. Aptos Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Green v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Andreotti v. AndreottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API